In many industries, dangerous gases (or dusts) are needed for or result from processes. When the use of such compounds is not avoidable, the risk of explosion must be minimized by following the existing regulations (ATEX directives in Europe) and international standard best practices (IECEx).
The risk of explosion comes from the combination of three factors:
If one of these elements is not present, the risk of explosion is minimized. For example, most potentially explosive gases need a certain concentration to cause an explosion. If the gas is too diluted in air, the chain reaction won’t start, if the gas is too concentrated, not enough oxygen is present and the reaction won’t self sustain. A gas, to be explosive, must have a concentration between its Lower and the Upper Explosion Levels (LEL and UEL).
The risks posed by the gas mixture and by the ignition source can be quantified (e.g. the gas concentration and the temperature of the ignition source increase the risk of explosion) and categorized.
The ATEX directives and IECEx standards take into account the level of risk posed by the gas mix and equipment (the type of gas, its risk of ignition, the frequency of the presence of such gas, the protection concept of the sources of ignition, etc..), and provide guidelines on which pieces of equipment are compatible with the processes under scrutiny.
The machines are analyzed and rated, the industrial environments are audited for their explosion risk, and with these elements the user has to ensure that the machine rating matches the atmosphere rating.
Many Levitronix products are certified with respect to their likelihood to cause an explosion of a dangerous mix of gases or dust. This certification follows the European Directive (ATEX) and the International IECEx Standard. These two codes overlap in most sections, therefore occasionally only one code is expressed in the labeling, since the counterpart from the other code can be directly extrapolated (for example, the IECEx Zone codes and the corresponding ATEX Category codes are shown in Table 1).
In this topic, there is a description of what each section of the marking means, the other existing options, and an example of a comparison of two Levitronix products, from the Ex perspective.
Let’s take as an example the Ex marking on the Levitronix BFS-i06 :
The first distinction is that there are two separate codes, the first related to gases (some sections contain a G) and the second to dusts (some sections contain a D). Let’s analyze block by block their meaning:
As shown in Figure 2, the same zone rating applies to both the inside and the outside of the fan. This means that the dangerous gas (or dust) mixture can be both the process fluid being pumped, or the surrounding fluid (e.g. in case of a failure somewhere else in the system), and in neither case the fan will cause an explosion.
Not only fans are Ex rated. Levitronix pumps often have a rating which reflects the explosion risk of the motor and pump head. The controllers and external interfaces are not in the scope of the rating in these cases.
Typically more pump heads are compatible with the same motor, and usually a selection of motors – pump heads combinations are included in the same Ex certification. In the certificate itself it is possible to see all rated combinations (as an example, see Figure 3).
The Ex certificate has a unique identifier number, which is reported on the sticker present on the pump drive. The code can end with “X”, meaning that the rating is valid if some special requirements are fulfilled (see Figure 4). The requirements are written in the manual, and refer for example to the fact that the pump head should be filled with liquid. If this requirement is fulfilled, it is clear that the inside of the pump head contains no gas, and therefore it is not a Explosion Risk rated zone.
As an example, the Ex rating of another Levitronix products is compared against the fan.
Levitronix BPS-i100 pump reports the following Ex marking:
The equipment group is II (as for the fans), meaning that the pump is not rated to be used in mines.
The category is 3GD (Zones 2/22), a class lower than the fans. This is because the pumps are made to transport liquids, and are not usually exposed to explosive gas mixtures (unless it’s for temporary conditions or accidents). Fans have a higher rating because their function is to transport said gas mixtures during standard operation.
The protection concept is similar to the fan: the motor is encapsulated (protection against electrical sources of ignition), and there are no mechanical sources of ignition (intrinsic safety).
The gas and dust mixture level of danger (ease of ignition) is the same as for the fan. Both products in fact have a IIC/IIIC rating. As explained, the difference is in the likelihood of being exposed to such gases (the zone rating).
The temperature rating is T4 (T90 for dust), meaning a lower rating than for fans. This indicated that some surface of the pump drive might reach higher temperatures than the fan, hence posing a higher risk of ignition.
For all these reasons, the EPL is Gc/Dc, a class lower than for the fans.
Fans therefore pose a lower risk of explosion, and can be used in more challenging environments.